But how they really compare to the market and how they are correlated between themselves?
From June 2009 till January 2012 Gandalf SFIO virtually didn't change its value:
The annualized return over this period is -0.14%. Meanwhile, WIG20 returned +12.15%.
The main feature of Gandalf SFIO is its low negative correlation with the index.
As for Opera Alfa-Plus, the fund returned +22.8% since inception and +8.62% annualized:
Still that's worse than WIG20 which grew by +31.2%:
In contrast to Gandalf SFIO, the correlation between Opera Alfa-Plus and WIG20 is slightly positive.
It gets quite interesting when you compare performance between the funds:
Opera Alfa-Plus has clearly been better performing than Gandalf SFIO so far, but the funds have been negatively correlated, so the future may change that.
Nevertheless, beating the index (basic buy and hold strategy) is not an easy task. So what do you get for the management fees?